CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 15.24%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $268.16, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $58.31 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Carvana has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Etsy.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.82%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $852.2M. Carvana's net income of $79M is lower than Etsy's net income of $129.9M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.16x while Etsy's PE ratio is 18.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 1.98x versus 2.10x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -42.85%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $268.16, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that Carvana has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.16x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 1.98x versus 2.31x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 9.17%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $268.16, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $340.25 which suggests that it could grow by 44.26%. Given that Carvana has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Tesla.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.16x while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 1.98x versus 8.44x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -4.1%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $268.16, signalling upside risk potential of 52.28%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $54.79 which suggests that it could grow by 72.88%. Given that Wayfair has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Wayfair is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 3.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 244.36%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$128M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.16x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 1.98x versus 0.33x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.